Contact Center Industry News

TMCNet:  Fish & Richardson Obtains Federal Circuit Affirmance of Patent Infringement Win for the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated

[April 08, 2014]

Fish & Richardson Obtains Federal Circuit Affirmance of Patent Infringement Win for the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated

NEW YORK --(Business Wire)--

Fish & Richardson (News - Alert) announced today that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed that the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (CBOE) does not infringe the '707 patent owned by International Securities Exchange (ISE). The Federal Circuit's April 7, 2014 ruling came after nearly eight years of fierce litigation that included two district court cases, two Federal Circuit appeals, and ISE's request for over $400 million in damages plus trebling.

"This is a huge victory and vindication for our client CBOE. ISE's case was lost after its first appeal to the Federal Circuit. On remand, it tried to litigate a case it knew it didn't have, but the District Court held ISE to the unfavorable ruling from the first appeal. Yet somehow ISE thought the Federal Circuit would change its mind about its own ruling in this second appeal," said Jonathan Marshall, a principal at Fish & Richardson who served as co-lead counsel for CBOE. "While we are thrilled to cement this win for CBOE, this is a case that ISE lost a long time ago, and so should have gone away a long time ago. We applaud the perseverance of CBOE's management and in-house legal team, who saw this case trough and allowed justice to be done," added Fish principal Michael Zoppo, co-lead counsel for CBOE.

The case dates back to November 2006 when ISE sued CBOE in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that CBOE infringed its patent on an automated exchange. CBOE operates the Hybrid Trading System, which integrates manual open outcry and electronic trading into a single exchange. Fish got the case transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and obtained summary judgment of non-infringement in March 2011.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit ruled in May 2012 that ISE's '707 patent disavowed open outcry and partially automated exchanges. ISE kept litigating the case on remand, but did not address the issue of disavowal, which allowed Fish to use a series of pre-trial motions to preclude ISE's entire theory of infringement. This led to ISE's March 2013 consent judgment of non-infringement in favor of CBOE - moments before opening statements were scheduled to begin.

The Federal Circuit's April 8, 2014 ruling quotes largely from its prior May 2012 opinion to affirm that the District Court properly applied its prior ruling on disavowal and to affirm the judgment of non-infringement that ISE stipulated to.

The Fish team representing CBOE included Jonathan Marshall, David Francescani, and Michael Zoppo, principals in the firm's New York office; Frank Porcelli, a principal in the firm's Boston office; and New York associates Brian Doyle, Leah Edelman (News - Alert), and Jeffrey Mok.

Fish & Richardson is a global patent, intellectual property (IP) litigation, and commercial litigation law firm with more than 400 attorneys and technology specialists across the U.S. and Europe. Fish has been named the #1 patent litigation firm in the U.S. for 10 consecutive years. Fish has been winning cases worth billions in controversy - often by making new law - for the most innovative clients and influential industry leaders since 1878. For more information, visit

[ Back To Cloud Contact Center's Homepage ]


Featured Resources

Featured Report
Millennial Research on Customer Service Expectations

Millennial Research on Customer Service Expectations

The "why" behind this research is simple: our clients recognize that different generations bring different expectations, varied communication preferences and new customer service patterns to the customer experience...
Featured Report
Optimizing the Customer Experience through Cloud Contact Centers

Optimizing the Customer Experience through Cloud Contact Centers

Adoption of cloud contact centers is on the rise. Findings from Aberdeen's January 2014 'Public Cloud vs. On-Premise: How to More Effectively Deploy a Cloud Center' study shows that 31% of contact centers are deployed in the cloud, and our related blog post highlights that companies anticipate their adoption of cloud technology to rise further throughout 2014...
Featured Report
Aberdeen report

Aberdeen Report: Cloud for Mid-Sized Contact Centers – What You Must Know

Cloud Technology is opening new doors for many businesses. However, it does so only when it's combined with the use of best practices and key technology enablers. This document highlights the adoption of cloud technology by mid-size contact centers and illustrates the reasons driving their investments...
Featured Whitepaper
Aberdeen report

Seven Critical Capabilities to Demand From Your Cloud Contact Center Provider

To deliver a world-class customer experience, your contact center must be flexible and reliable, while providing all the tools agents and supervisors need to manage their workflows. Here are seven critical capabilities to look for when deploying a contact center in the cloud...
Featured Webinar

Contact Center Economics and the Cloud

Together, Bob and Drew will help you understand the economic value of upgrading technology, important business and financial considerations, and how to compare total cost of ownership of a premises vs. cloud or hosted solution. Watch the webinar on-demand now...
Featured Datasheet
Zipwire Cloud Contact Center

Zipwire Cloud Contact Center

The appeal of moving services to the cloud is obvious. Cloud services offer reliability and robust feature sets without the need to implement or maintain complex contact center infrastructure. The Zipwire™ cloud-based contact center allows businesses to leverage the flexibility and cost savings of cloud architecture while offering a seamless, first-class customer experience...